Amend entry 1, because benefits should be captured in the benefits realization strategy.

No change to entry 1, because the benefits register should capture all benefits.

Amend entry 2, because all key benefits, whether or NOT they are cash-releasing, should be identified and monitored.

No change to entry 2, because all benefits should be measured in financial terms.

No change to entry 2, because only financial benefits should be included in the business case.

The Pittville Project Manager is responsible for producing regular progress reports for the Senior Responsible Owner of the project.

The local university has proposed to run a series of workshops in the Western Area to prepare for university applications.

The rationalization of courses to improve pupil/teacher ratios.

The Reference Project is based on using the same property management company that maintains Pittville University.

The attainment of qualifications should increase by 15% through the provision of betterfacilities.

The Local Education Authority Director has agreed to be the Senior Responsible Owner for the Pittville project.

Physical access to learning will be improved throughout the region as the new site has good access from most of Pittville.

Local parents are opposed to the closing of Pittville High School.

All further education units need to be absorbed into the new campus, reducing the number of educational providers to choose from.

Staff at the new campus will automatically become employees of Pittville University with the same terms and conditions of employment.

The parties shall attempt to resolve any dispute through negotiations between senior executives of the parties, who have authority to settle the same.

The new campus building is to be listed as an asset on the Local Education Authority balance sheet.

The return on the investment will repay the sum of the original investment over 10 years.

The contract period for development of the new campus is three years.

How charges for the preferred service provider's offer have been modelled, including the resultant benefits.

Capital and revenue implications of the resultant deal, including any costs falling to the organization.

Net effect on the organization's charges (prices), if any.

Service streams and outputs being contracted for.

Should be carried forward to the short listed options.

Delivers against one or more of the critical success factors.

Will represent a benchmark for Value For Money throughout the appraisal process.

Supports one or more of the Spending Objectives.

Incorrectly identified as a Scoping Solution.

New opportunities will be available for teachers to be involved in delivering the new education courses.

The 'BAU/status quo' option is the baseline for assessing value for money.

There is a reasonably positive reaction from local schools to the Old Fire Station Headquarters being used as a second site.

The demographic forecasts are for further reductions in the demand for places over the next five years.

A new campus would provide modern and better facilities at a cheaper cost than refitting existing buildings.

No, because assurance of the delivery strategy should be held before benefits realization plans are finalized.

No, because assurance of the investment decision should be held before Stage 4 - Implementation.

Yes, because assurance of the investment decision ensures the investment is sound before the planning for delivery is finalized.

Yes, because assurance of the investment decision should be held before procurement of the Value For Money solution.

The Financial Appraisal shows that this scheme is unaffordable.

At the end of Year 6, E6 million of the initial spending costs will have been recovered.

The surplus Income forecast in Year 1 is sufficient to cover the deficit forecast in Year 2.

The revenue budget should show how long it will take for the surplus income to cover the initial cost of building the new campus.

If expenditure and income continue at the same rate, each subsequent year should return a surplus of £1 million.

The required services which will form the basis for the 'statement of needs (SON)'.

Associated policies, directives, initiatives and regulations.

As wide a range of options as possible that meet the spending objectives.

Construction costs could be higher than expected.

Critical success factors essential to the successful delivery of the project.

The merger of Longshire Agricultural College and Greenhills University.

The area is served by Pittville University and four secondary schools; three of

which have further education units.

Long term financial viability of the education and training system for 11-18-

year-olds.

The priority is learning provision for 16-18-year-olds in Pittville.

Each Local Government Authority has a budget for adult learning.

The campus is to be run by Pittville University but there is stakeholder resistance.

The new campus will have the space to extend the number of education courses as student numbers increase.

The new campus can provide technology to enable Welsh language teaching throughout the region.

The project must comply with the Special Educational Needs and Disability Act.

The Consortium has been meeting on a formal basis for nine months.

Establish the Pittville project spending objectives.

Confirm the requirements for 16 to 18-year-old learners can be met.

Manage the risks retained by the public sector.

Arrange and schedule the resources required to develop the new learning campus.

No, because risks should be identified in the Outline Business Case.

No, because this is a service risk associated with the design and build phases of the project.

Yes, because the local planning authority is an external organization.

Yes, because changes to the Old Fire Station Headquarters site will affect the environment.

Produce regular progress reports for the Senior Responsible Owner of the

project.

Appoint the Senior Responsible Owner for the project.

Approve the specification for the new learning campus.

Approve the continuation of the project at the end of each delivery stage.

No, because inflation should be included as a cost in the Financial Appraisal.

No, because any increase in cost should be dealt with as an issue.

Yes, because any cost increase could threaten the affordability of a scheme.

Yes, because any risk that might affect the financial viability of a scheme should be closely managed.

Amend entry 1, because the strategy for the realization of benefits should be confirmed within the OBC.

Delete entry 1, because schools and universities will be responsible for the delivery of the benefits.

No change to entry 1, because the strategy for the realization of benefits should be revisited and re-affirmed within the FBC.

Amend entry 2, because the project manager is responsible for benefits realization.

No change to entry 2, because this is appropriate to this section.

There will be a funding gap in Year 2 when the Expenditure is forecast to exceed the Income.

The affordability of the scheme is NOT dependent upon the income from the sale of Pittville High School.

Income from the hire of the sports facilities should NOT be shown as a separate source of income.

Funding to help pay for the construction of the new campus should be shown as a separate source of income in the Revenue Budget.

Local Education Authority (LEA) Funding should be moved to the Economic Appraisal.

Amend entry 1, because all projects should use a benefits register to identify key benefits and how they will be tracked.

Amend entry 1, because the benefits realization strategy for the project should outline how the programme's approach to realizing benefits is being adapted for the project.

Amend entry 2, because the potential benefits from the project should be documented only in the Economic Case.

No change to entry 2, because when a project is part of a wider programme, benefits should be tracked only at the programme level.

No change to entry 2, because tracking benefits at the programme level will help to avoid double counting of benefits from different projects.

No, because the underlying business need of falling 16-18-year-olds participation in education remains the same.

No, because an increase in interest will NOT reduce the support for the preferred option from the Local Education Authority.

Yes, because any changes to service requirements may require following-up throughout the whole case.

Yes, because students are Pittville project stakeholders.

No, because this should be one of the service solution options when determining the long list.

No, because Topland LEA's preferences should be listed as critical success factors.

Yes, because this supports the requirement for the solution to be financially viable in the long term.

Yes, because Topland LEA initiated the project and therefore has the authority to determine the preferred solution.