Vault-Associate Dumps With Exact Questions and Answers

The transit secrets engine is not a good solution for binaries of this size, because it is designed to handle cryptographic functions on data in-transit, not data at-rest. The transit secrets engine does not store any data sent to it, so it would require sending the entire 2GB blob to Vault for encryption or decryption, which would be inefficient and impractical. A better solution would be to use the transit secrets engine to generate a data key, which is a high-entropy key that can be used to encrypt or decrypt data locally. The data key can be returned in plaintext or wrapped by another key, depending on the use case. This way, the transit secrets engine only handles the encryption or decryption of the data key, not the data itself, and the data can be stored in any primary data store. References: Transit - Secrets Engines | Vault | HashiCorp Developer, Encryption as a service: transit secrets engine | Vault | HashiCorp Developer

The maximum time-to-live (TTL) for a token is defined by the lowest value among the following factors:

• The authentication method that issued the token. Each auth method can have a default and a maximum TTL for the tokens it generates. These values can be configured by the auth method’s mount options or by the auth method’s specific endpoints.
• The mount endpoint configuration that the token is accessing. Each secrets engine can have a default and a maximum TTL for the leases it grants. These values can be configured by the secrets engine’s mount options or by the secrets engine’s specific endpoints.
• A parent token TTL. If a token is created by another token, it inherits the remaining TTL of its parent token, unless the parent token has an infinite TTL (such as the root token). A child token cannot outlive its parent token.
• System max TTL. This is a global limit for all tokens and leases in Vault. It can be configured by the system backend’s max_lease_ttl option.

The client system that uses the token cannot define the maximum TTL for the token, as this is determined by Vault’s configuration and policies. The client system can only request a specific TTL for the token, but this request is subject to the limits imposed by the factors above.

References: https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/concepts/tokens 3, https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/concepts/lease 2, https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/commands/auth/tune 4, https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/commands/secrets/tune 5, https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/commands/token/create 6

When unsealing Vault, each Shamir unseal key should be entered by different administrators each connecting from different computers. This is because the Shamir unseal keys are split into shares that are distributed to trusted operators, and no single operator should have access to more than one share. This way, the unseal process requires the cooperation of a quorum of key holders, and enhances the security and availability of Vault. The unseal keys can be entered via multiple mechanisms from multiple client machines, and the process is stateful. The order of the keys does not matter, as long as the threshold number of keys is reached. The unseal keys should not be entered at the command line in one single command, as this would expose them to the history and compromise the security. The unseal keys should not be encrypted with each administrator’s PGP key, as this would prevent Vault from decrypting them and reconstructing the master key. References: https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/concepts/seal 3, https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/commands/operator/unseal