PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 Dumps With Exact Questions and Answers

Ansible interacts with PAN-OS through its API.

Why C is correct:Ansible uses the PAN-OS XML API to manage configurations. This allows for programmatic interaction and automation.  

Why A, B, and D are incorrect:

A. Ansible can only be used to automate configuration changes on physical firewalls but not virtual firewalls:Ansible can manage both physical (PA-Series) and virtual (VM-Series, CN-Series) firewalls.

B. Ansible requires direct access to the firewall’s CLI to make changes:Ansible doesnotrequire direct CLI access. It uses the API, which is more structured and secure.

D. Ansible requires the use of Python to create playbooks:While Ansible playbooks are written in YAML, you don't need to write Python code directly. Ansible modules handle the underlying API interactions. The pan-os-python SDK is a separate tool thatcanbe used for more complex automation tasks, but it's not required for basic Ansible playbooks.

Palo Alto Networks References:

Ansible Collections for Palo Alto Networks:These collections, available on Ansible Galaxy, provide modules for interacting with PAN-OS via the API.  

Palo Alto Networks Documentation on API Integration:The API documentation describes how to use the XML API for configuration management.

Palo Alto Networks GitHub Repositories:Palo Alto Networks provides examples and resources on using Ansible with PAN-OS.

Using a Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) in a public cloud environment offers several key advantages related to security and scalability:

A. Complete security solution for the public cloud provider's physical host regardless of security measures:Palo Alto Networks NGFWs operate at the network layer (and above), inspecting traffic flowing in and out of your virtual networks (VPCs in AWS, VNETs in Azure, etc.). Theydo notprovide security for the underlying physical infrastructure of the cloud provider. That's the cloud provider's responsibility. NGFWs secure your workloadswithinthe cloud environment.

B. Automatic scaling of NGFWs to meet the security needs of growing applications and public cloud environments:This is a significant benefit. Cloud NGFWs can often be configured to auto-scale based on traffic demands. As your applications grow and require more bandwidth and processing, the NGFW can automatically scale up its resources (or deploy additional instances) to maintain performance and security. This elasticity is a core advantage of cloud-based firewalls.

C. Ability to manage the public cloud provider's physical hosts:As mentioned above, NGFWs do not provide management capabilities for the cloud provider's physical infrastructure. You manage your virtual network resources and the NGFW itself, but not the underlying hardware.

D. Consistent Security policy to inbound, outbound, and east-west network traffic throughout the multi-cloud environment:This is a crucial advantage, especially in multi-cloud deployments. Palo Alto Networks NGFWs allow you to enforce consistent security policies across different cloud environments (AWS, Azure, GCP, etc.). This ensures consistent protection regardless of where your workloads are running and simplifies security management. East-west traffic (traffic between workloads within the same cloud environment) is also a key focus, as it's often overlooked by traditional perimeter-based security.

The question asks about a capability common to VM-Series deployments across Azure, GCP, and AWS, as described in the "Securing Applications" design guides.

C. Horizontal scalability through cloud-native load balancers:This is the correct answer. A core concept in cloud deployments, and emphasized in the "Securing Applications" guides, is using cloud-native load balancers (like Azure Load Balancer, Google Cloud Load Balancing, and AWS Elastic Load Balancing) to distribute traffic across multiple VM-Series firewall instances. This provides horizontal scalability, high availability, and fault tolerance. This is common across all three major cloud providers.  

Why other options are incorrect:

A. BGP dynamic routing to peer with cloud and on-premises routers:While BGP is supported by VM-Series and can be used for dynamic routing in cloud environments, it is not explicitly highlighted as acommoncapability across all three clouds in the "SecuringApplications" guides. The guides focus more on the application security aspects and horizontal scaling. Also, the specific BGP configurations and integrations can differ slightly between cloud providers.

B. GlobalProtect portal and gateway services:While GlobalProtect can be used with VM-Series in cloud environments, the "Securing Applications" guides primarily focus on securing application trafficwithinthe cloud environment, not remote access. GlobalProtect is more relevant for remote user access or site-to-site VPNs, which are not the primary focus of these guides.

D. Site-to-site VPN:While VM-Series firewalls support site-to-site VPNs in all three clouds, this is not the core focus or common capability highlighted in the "Securing Applications" guides. These guides emphasize securing application traffic within the cloud using techniques like microsegmentation and horizontal scaling.

Palo Alto Networks References:

The key reference here is the "Securing Applications" design guides for VM-Series firewalls. These guides are available on the Palo Alto Networks support site (live.paloaltonetworks.com). Searching for "VM-Series Securing Applications" along with the name of the respective cloud provider (Azure, GCP, AWS) will usually provide the relevant guides